There have been many a times in the past when I have been on the verge of losing it. But for the first time it is for something as materialistic as a digital SLR. Call me mad, but ever since I sold my 350D, I've been a nervous wreck. And at one point of time, I even thought of selling 40k worth of Canon lenses and moving to Nikon because of the new Nikon D80. It took me a while to understand that having to wait for the review of the Canon Rebel XTi was getting too much for me and that is why I was swaying towards buying a D80 (whose review is out, and which has been judged as a gaint leap for Nikonkind). Of course, the irony of the matter is that just when good friend Akshata was supposed to buy either of the cameras from S'pore, she has completely disappeared (and I sincerly hope all is well with her). Not seen her online in a while and that worries me.
Actually, upon further introspection I realized that the 400D forums on DPreview is a bad place to hangout when you are a cat sitting on the wall. Until recently I was totally convinced that Canon is a great company because of being R&D driven, but after hearing so many rants about the 400D, I almost regretted being a Canon shooter. Hell, I even thought that the 400D is a bad decision!
Of course, now I know better. The 400D forums, remarkable as it may sound, is almost giving rise to an Urban Myth. A Myth that has many shades to it:
- Canon has bad QC because some guy couldn't see readings on the viewfinder when pointing his camera at the TV
- Canon's 400D is a failure because some guy couldn't get sharp shots indoors with flashed turned OFF (!!)
- The 400D underexposes to preserve highlights/show less noise/Canon has a Nikon spy inside it's factory. Some guy even started a thread saying "Buyer's Beware - 400D underexposes". And the best part, he uses the camera in auto mode.
- Some guy is convinced that the 400D has lock up issues. He calls up Canon and points them to the DPreview forums to show them the same. He wants to set the ball rolling on getting Canon to release a firmware update. How he got this strange idea of400D having lockup issues, I don't know. I have seen no one complaining of it.
With so many 'duhs', I won't be surprised if Canon starts including a disclaimer stating that buying a digital SLR does not automatically get you great photos. And when you don't get great photos just because you got a DSLR, don't blame the camera.
From my own learning curve, I can say that photography is both an art and a science. The science part I am yet to completely grasp, and it is indeed fun learning. With new DSLRs falling in price, I am not suprised that many people don't see it that way. Spend more money - get better photos. That seems to be what most people think when they upgrade from a P&S. A similar analogy would be the general thought that having a big car would get you good chicks and that's all you need in life. Ok, I am going overboard here
Nevertheless, I have somehow convinced myself to stick with Canon. On the other hand, the Nikon is really a great camera. Especially the viewfinder. It's addictive, I would say. And that's exactly what I need to go out an shoot more. I need a camera that screams "look at me sitting here doing nothing. Take me out and SHOOT!" Yes, I somehow deep inside believe that the Nikon D80 is that kind of a camera. As Phil concludes in his review, the D80 is a "photographer's camera". And without even seeing the 400D's review, I can say that Canon's entry level DSLR is just that - an entry level DSLR for P&S upgraders.
However, when it comes to image quality, Canon has always had an advantage, and is still leading over the D80 by a whisker. I would certainly want to opt for the best image quality. But the fact that I want to move up from an entry level DSLR to a 'photographer's camera' makes me still consider buying a Nikon. Aaaarrggghh…..i'm starting it off all over again!!!